Skip to main content
GSA Logo - U.S. General Services Administration

USA Hire Agentic Platform

All comparisons

GS-0560 Budget Analysis — existing vs. agent-built

Series 0560 · finance

Budget Analysis

Budget formulation, justification, execution, and analysis across the federal planning-programming-budgeting cycle.

Existing overall
51
Agent-built overall
94
Existing assessment
USA Hire Standard Competencies Battery + Occupational Questionnaire
Vendor: OPM USA Hire

USA Hire general competencies + Occupational Questionnaire. Technical budget-specific KSAs (OMB A-11, GAO Red Book appropriations law, Anti-Deficiency Act) are not directly measured.

Agent-built equivalent
Budget Analysis · 14-agent swarm
Modality mix: Job Knowledge Test + Work Sample + Situational Judgment

Job analysis anchored to O*NET / MOSAIC + OMB Circular A-11, Anti-Deficiency Act (31 U.S.C. §1341). Every item carries signed task → KSAO → item provenance. Gated by licensed I-O psychologist sign-off before any applicant sees it.

Build this assessment →

Eight-dimension comparison

Each axis is scored 0–100 using the rubric in comparisonMetrics.ts. Existing numbers come from the researched record; agent-built numbers reflect the swarm's uniform quality gates.

Technical KSAOCoverageBias AuditRigorLegal DefensibilityArtifactsModality DiversityJob-Relatedness TraceabilityChance to CompeteAct ComplianceApplicant ExperienceScore Explainability
Existing assessment
Agent-built assessment

Chance to Compete Act (Pub. L. 118-19) three-prong test

  • §3(2)(A) Allows applicants to demonstrate job-related skills

    §3(2)(A) — the assessment must permit an applicant to demonstrate job-related knowledge, skills, abilities, or competencies, not merely attest to them.

    Existing: partial
    Agent-built: yes
  • §3(2)(B) Is based on a job analysis

    §3(2)(B) — content must be derived from a current job analysis that identifies the tasks and the KSAOs required to perform them.

    Existing: yes
    Agent-built: yes
  • §3(2)(C) Is not principally reliant on a self-assessment

    §3(2)(C) — the assessment "does not solely include or principally rely upon a self-assessment from an automated examination."

    Existing: partial
    Agent-built: yes

Technical KSAO coverage gap

Of the 5 critical technical KSAOs identified in the job analysis for this series, how many does each assessment directly measure (not self-report)?

Existing0 / 5 (0%)
Agent-built5 / 5 (100%)

Per-dimension detail

Technical Coverage
Technical KSAO Coverage
RFI §3.2 — technical, not general/cognitive-only
+62
Existing30

No series-specific technical KSAOs are directly measured — assessment is non-technical or inferred.

Agent-built92

14-agent swarm maps every task → KSAO → item; ≥90% of critical technical KSAOs directly measured, no self-report proxies.

Bias & Fairness
Bias Audit Rigor
EEOC 4/5ths; DIF per NCME Standards §3.17
+40
Existing55

DIF analysis: yes; adverse impact studied.

Agent-built95

Per-item bias sensitivity review + pilot DIF (Mantel-Haenszel / logistic regression) + adverse-impact 4/5ths pre-deployment simulation.

Legal Defensibility
Legal Defensibility Artifacts
29 CFR §1607.15 documentation package
+36
Existing60

content / criterion / construct validity evidence; no public technical report.

Agent-built96

Auto-drafted 29 CFR §1607.15 packet: job analysis, content validity matrix (Lawshe CVR), technical report, signed audit log.

Modality Mix
Modality Diversity
RFI §3.2 — JKT / Work Sample / Simulation / SI / SJT
+43
Existing45

3 modalities: SJT, Reading / reasoning, Self-report.

Agent-built88

Blueprint enforces minimum 3 of 5 RFI modalities where content supports it (JKT + Work Sample + SJT / Simulation / SI).

Job Relatedness
Job-Relatedness Traceability
29 CFR §1607.14(C); Chance to Compete §3(2)(B)
+52
Existing45

Partial traceability — validation evidence exists but item-level provenance is not public.

Agent-built97

Every item carries a cryptographically signed provenance record: task statement → KSA → criticality/frequency → item.

Chance to Compete Act
Chance to Compete Act Compliance
Pub. L. 118-19 §3(2)(A)(B)(C)
+46
Existing50

Three-prong test flags: (A) partial, (C) partial.

Agent-built96

Three-prong compliance enforced at the blueprint gate: (A) skill demonstration, (B) job-analysis anchored, (C) ≤10% self-rating by weight.

Applicant Experience
Applicant Experience
RFI §5.2.1 mobile; Section 508 AA
+18
Existing72

mobile-compatible; Section 508 VPAT available; FK grade 11.

Agent-built90

Tailwind-responsive, Section 508 AA verified, Flesch-Kincaid target grade 9–11, accommodation paths pre-wired.

Score Explainability
Score Explainability
NIST AI RMF 1.0 — Explainability; OMB M-24-10
+44
Existing50

Aggregate score returned; sub-score breakdown and rationale generally not available to applicants.

Agent-built94

Each score includes IRT theta + SEM + KSAO sub-scores + plain-English rationale (NIST AI RMF explainability).

Bias & fairness findings

Drawn from the researched record for this series. Severity follows EEOC / NCME Standards guidance.

  • No public technical report

    External defensibility review requires a public §1607.15 report. Agent-built runs auto-publish the technical report with the final assessment.

  • Historical concern

    The Chance to Compete Act of 2023 (Pub. L. 118-19) §3(2)(C) defines a Technical Assessment as one that "does not solely include or principally rely upon a self-assessment from an automated examination" — squarely aimed at this pattern

  • Historical concern

    OPM May 2025 Merit Hiring Plan directs agencies to reduce reliance on occupational questionnaires as the primary screening instrument

  • Historical concern

    Luevano v. Campbell (1981) consent decree history of general-cognitive federal screens